Qualitative Election Study of Britain

We will use data from a longitudinal qualitative study called the Qualitative Election Study of Britain.

Here’s an explanation of the study by it’s leads:

The QESB is a collaborative effort between researchers from the UWE Bristol, the University of Dundee, and GESIS in Germany. Since our launch in 2010, our aim has been to learn about the thoughts, feelings, and opinions of every day voters, before and after the UK general election. To this end, we hold focus groups and interviews, online and in-person. During this general election period, we want to hear your thoughts on political life in the UK. Whether it’s about the election, political leaders, parties, economic concerns, the NHS, or climate change, we want to hear it all.

Hear a little bit about the study from one of its PIs, Ediza Carvalho, based at the University of Dundee:

The data is open access and available from the UK Data Service.

We chose this dataset because it contains a variety of file formats, including focus group discussions and in-depth interviews conducted around elections and referenda which are related over time in 2010, 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017.

Sign the agreement to use the data for teaching

The data subset we are using

The data we will be working with was collected in 2015 and 2016, and were timed to collect opinions prior to the UK 2015 General Election, and just after the EU or ‘Brexit’ Referendum. This period was one of great political unpredictability and voter volatility. Both of those votes had controversial and unexpected results: the 2015 Election was a surprise win for the Conservatives, and in Scotland, the Scottish National Party made huge gains over Labour. The 2016 EU referendum resulted in a 52% vote to leave the European Union, and this marked a change in the UK’s relationship with Europe and the rest of the world.

The data extract we are using allows longitudinal linkage because some of the people who took part in the 2015 focus groups later participated in a 1-2-1 telephone interview.

The data citations:

Carvalho, E., Winters, K. (2019). Qualitative Election Study of Britain, 2015. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 8117, DOI

Carvalho, E., Winters, K., Oliver, T. (2023). The Qualitative Election Study of Britain: The EU Referendum Interviews Dataset, 2016. [data collection]. UK Data Service. SN: 856170, DOI

Some more information:

Carvalho, Edzia and Winters, Kristi and Oliver, Thom (2023). The Qualitative Election Study of Britain: The EU Referendum Interviews Dataset, 2016. [Data Collection]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Service. 10.5255/UKDA-SN-856170

Open research

This dataset is a brilliant example of Open Science: the data are open access but also organised to promote reusability. This is good practice, and there a lot of resources to help guide you on the use and reuse of secondary data, and how you can play your part.

For more information on open research and data:

Open Qualitative Research

Not-you🤢 It’s not you, it’s NVivo

Important to making data and analysis open is storing it in an ‘interoperable’ and ‘open’ format. Interoperable means that the files are not restricted to being opened by a specific single application, such as NVivo. An open standard is one that is available for anyone to use, share, or access - where it could be opened on NVivo, Atlas.ti, and so on.

Fully ‘open research’ remains limited within qualitative research for various reasons. One important limitation is whilst there is an interoperable open QDPX format for sharing qualitative data analysis projects, it is a ‘lossy’ format – where folder structures and more are lost when exporting to the open format.

So, although it is possible to export to QDPX and import it to a different application - such as exporting from NVivo and importing in Atlas.ti - any folder structure and other aspects would be lost in the process.